(v0.3)
Magneto-Electric Fields, Waves and Aether
Positron and Electron do the helix dance
I only put 2 and 2 together... it equals 4, and it's that simple.
I only put 2 and 2 together... it equals 4, and it's that simple.
The simple truth about EM waves
First, let me equate fields with particles. So, for example, we have electric negative field which is spherical and have some center where this field potential is strongest, we call it electron and even though this field stretches to infinity we somewhat appropriately consider it a point particle as this potential drops rapidly according to inverse-square law.
So, we have these spherical electric fields with positive and negative potentials, their "particle names" are positron and electron. Now, we know that when these charges/fields/particles move they also produce magnetic fields. These magnetic fields are cylindrical, so at the end we get two overlapping field potentials sharing the same center and constituting one particle or charge.
All we have to know now is what happens when these positrons and electrons come together. To investigate this interaction we have to consider the forces involved between their electric and magnetic fields. In other words, having a single electron-positron pair, we have to calculate combined attraction and repulsion between all four of their fields.
So, what happens?
Due to magnetic force acting perpendicular to both the velocity vector and magnetic field vector they will twist around each other, they will produce spiral trajectory, or more precisely said - their paths will describe double-helix. Another word for this type of wavy movement is known as transverse wave.
The magnitude of an electric field surrounding two equally
charged (repelling) and two oppositely charged (attracting) particles.
charged (repelling) and two oppositely charged (attracting) particles.
So, we have these spherical electric fields with positive and negative potentials, their "particle names" are positron and electron. Now, we know that when these charges/fields/particles move they also produce magnetic fields. These magnetic fields are cylindrical, so at the end we get two overlapping field potentials sharing the same center and constituting one particle or charge.
All we have to know now is what happens when these positrons and electrons come together. To investigate this interaction we have to consider the forces involved between their electric and magnetic fields. In other words, having a single electron-positron pair, we have to calculate combined attraction and repulsion between all four of their fields.
So, what happens?
Due to magnetic force acting perpendicular to both the velocity vector and magnetic field vector they will twist around each other, they will produce spiral trajectory, or more precisely said - their paths will describe double-helix. Another word for this type of wavy movement is known as transverse wave.
Pair production
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_production
Electromagnetic radiationn
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation
Electron–positron annihilation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron-electron_annihilation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_production
Electromagnetic radiationn
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation
Electron–positron annihilation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positron-electron_annihilation
- "Electromagnetic waves can be imagined as a self-propagating transverse oscillating wave of electric and magnetic fields.
- "The fact that the electromagnetic field can possess momentum and energy makes it very real... a particle makes a field, and a field acts on another particle, and the field has such familiar properties as energy content and momentum, just as particles can have"
Magnetic monopoles
right under everyone's nose
right under everyone's nose
The magnetic field of a moving charge is monopole, and while I'm at it let me explain a few things about positive/negative or north/south polarity. It is nothing more but a simple relation of opposite directions i.e. velocity vectors. You can choose whatever name you like, but the only thing that matters here is that fields lines of one pole will be in opposite direction to the other pole, and that's it. The point is, if you have field lines going in two opposite directions, then you have a dipole, but if you have field lines going in only one direction, then you ought to call it a monopole.
Monopole magnetic fields drop off with inverse-square (1/r^2) , just like monopole electric fields, which is obvious from Coulomb's law. And if you look at the equations for magnetic field of a moving charge, also known as Biot-Savart law, you may notice the same thing. However, dipole magnetic fields drop of as inverse-cube (1/r^3), which ultimately proves this point.
Interestingly enough, this goes along beautifully with what EDWARD LEEDSKALNIN told us quite some time ago when he was talking about "North pole individual magnets" and "South pole individual magnets". I suppose everyone knows about Ed, or at least about Coral Castle and Billy Idol's song "Sweet Sixteen"?
- "Dirac showed that the existence of magnetic monopoles was consistent with Maxwell's equations only if electric charges are quantized, which is observed."
The simple truth about Aether
Speed of light is terminal velocity of EM fields (particles). Just like free-falling objects reach their terminal velocity due to air drag, some "drag coefficient", so do EM fields have their terminal velocity due to resistance of Aether. This changes practically nothing about General Relativity equations since the 'speed of light' would still be the maximum speed of EM waves, and only difference is this interpretation that actually could explain the origin and cause for this maximum velocity, while GR just starts with that assumption.
Electromagnetic waves are EM fields (particles) moving through Aether describing a helix or spiral trajectory in three-dimensional space, but the field potentials would propagate much faster, as longitudinal waves. This explains "wave-particle duality", and hopefully double-slit mystery, once I manage to simulate it, which is what I'm working on right now.
Speed of magnetic and electric fields. So, here in this Aether, EM waves would correspond to slow transverse waves on water surface depending on Aether viscosity, while the propagation of field potentials would correspond to longitudinal waves depending on Aether compressibility, and they would be spherical, as opposed to EM waves that would be helical.
Aether is gravity field. Helical or transverse propagation of EM fields (EM waves) and longitudinal propagation of their potentials would therefore have different terminal velocity which would further be influenced by Aether density gradients or pressure differences that here correspond to gravitational potentials, also known as inertial reference frames.
Vorticity and magnetism. Aether "fluid-dynamics" analogy is probably the most obvious in the photo below as we can see the right-hand rule just like with Lorentz equation, where the force acts inward, towards decreased density and is attractive just like with magnetic field of a moving charge. Funny enough, Biot-Savart law, magnetic field equation, can be used equally well in electromagnetics just as in aerodynamics.
He commented that "whether there is an aether or not, electromagnetic FIELDS certainly exist, and so also does the energy of the electrical oscillations" so that, "if we do not like the name of "aether", we must use another word as a peg to hang all these things upon."
Lorentz force
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_force
Biot–Savart law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biot-savart_law
Biot–Savart law
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biot-savart_law
So, Lorentz was right after all
...Lorentz on his side continued to use the aether concept. In his lectures of around 1911 he pointed out that what "the theory of relativity has to say ... can be carried out independently of what one thinks of the aether and the time".
He commented that "whether there is an aether or not, electromagnetic FIELDS certainly exist, and so also does the energy of the electrical oscillations" so that, "if we do not like the name of "aether", we must use another word as a peg to hang all these things upon."
In the early 1920s, in a lecture which he was invited to give at Lorentz's university in Leiden, Einstein sought to reconcile the theory of relativity with his mentor's cherished concept of the aether. In this lecture Einstein stressed that, in general relativity, space is "endowed with physical quantities".
Shortly before his lecture in Leiden in 1920 he admitted in the paper: "Grundgedanken und Methoden der Relativitätstheorie in ihrer Entwicklung dargestellt": - Therefore I thought in 1905 that in physics one should not speak of the aether at all. This judgment was too radical though as we shall see with the next considerations about the general theory of relativity. It moreover remains, as before, allowed to assume a space-filling medium if one can refer to electromagnetic FIELDS.
The founder of quantum FIELD theory, Paul Dirac, stated in 1951 in an article in Nature, titled "Is there an Aether?" that "we are rather forced to have an aether".
And, why no one ever told you
how electrons actually attract?!?
how electrons actually attract?!?
- "The Z-pinch is an application of the Lorentz force, in which a current-carrying conductor in a magnetic field experiences a force. One example of the Lorentz force is that, if two parallel wires are carrying current in the same direction, the wires will be pulled toward each other. The Z-pinch uses this effect: the entire plasma can be thought of as many current-carrying wires, all carrying current in the same direction, and they are all pulled toward each other by the Lorentz force, thus the plasma contracts."
Cruelty and injustice...
There are, of course, those who do not want us to speak. I suspect even now orders are being shouted into telephones and men with guns will soon be on their way. Why?
Because while the truncheon may be used in lieu of conversation, words will always retain their power. Words offer the means to meaning and for those who will listen, the enunciation of truth..
Cruelty and injustice...
intolerance and oppression.
And where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have censors and systems of surveillance, coercing your conformity and soliciting your submission.
How did this happen? Who's to blame?
Well certainly there are those who are more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable. But again, truth be told... if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.
How did this happen? Who's to blame?
Well certainly there are those who are more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable. But again, truth be told... if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.
